¡¡ÌìÈ»ÃâÒßÊÇ»úÌåµÖ¿¹²¡¶¾ÈëÇֵĵÚÒ»µÀ·ÀÏß¡£Ï¸°ûÄÚ¿¹²¡¶¾ÌìÈ»ÃâÒß¹ý³ÌµÄ¿ªÆô£¬ÓÐÀµÓÚģʽʶ±ðÊÜÌ壨pattern-recognition receptors£¬pRRs£©¶ÔÓÚÍâÔ´´Ì¼¤µÄʶ±ð£¬²úÉú´óÁ¿µÄIÐ͸ÉÈÅËØ¡¢Ï¸°ûÒò×Ó¡¢²¹ÌåºÍÑ×ÐÔÒò×ӵȣ¬¹ãÆ×µØÇå³ý²¡Ô­Sport¡£Ä¿Ç°¹«ÈϵÄģʽʶ±ðÊÜÌåÖ÷ÒªÓÐTollÑùÊÜÌå¡¢NODÑùÊÜÌå¡¢RIG-IÑùÊÜÌåºÍ°û½¬DNAÊÜÌå¡£ÆäÖУ¬RIG-IÑùÊÜÌ壨RLRs£©°üÀ¨RIG-I£¨ÊÓ»ÆËáÓÕµ¼»ùÒòµ°°×I£©¡¢MDA5£¨ºÚËØÁö·Ö»¯Ïà¹Ø»ùÒò5£©ºÍLGp2Èý¸ö¼Ò×å³ÉÔ±¡£

Ê÷üš×÷ÎªÖØÒªµÄ¾ßÓÐDZÔÚÓ¦ÓüÛÖµµÄÐÂÐÍʵÑ鶯ÎÈÕ½¥Êܵ½ÖØÊÓ¡£Ç°ÆÚÖйú¿ÆÑ§ÔºÀ¥Ã÷¶¯ÎïÑо¿ËùÓëÉîÛÚ»ª´ó»ùÒòÑо¿ÔººÏ×÷£¬Íê³ÉÁËÊ÷üš»ùÒò×é½âÎö£¬È«Ãæ·ÖÎöÁËÊ÷üšµÄÒÅ´«ÌØÐÔ£¬½âÊÍÁËÆäÓÃÓÚÈËÀ༲²¡¶¯ÎïÄ£ÐÍ£¬ÓÈÆäÊDz¡¶¾¸ÐȾģÐÍ´´½¨µÄÒÅ´«»ù´¡£¬·¢ÏÖÆäÃâÒßϵͳ»ùÒò´æÔÚÌØÒìÐÔ£¬Èç»ùÒò×éÖÐRIG-I»ùÒòȱʧµÈ£¨Fan et al. 2013 Nature Communications£©¡£×÷ΪRLRs¼Ò×åµÄÒ»Ô±£¬RIG-IÊÇϸ°ûÄÚʶ±ð²¡¶¾Ë«Á´RNAµÄÒ»¸öÖØÒªÊÜÌ壬¶ÔÓÚµÖ¿¹RNA²¡¶¾µÄÈëÇÖÖÁ¹ØÖØÒª¡£RIG-I»ùÒòΪºÎ¿ÉÒÔÔÚÊ÷üš»ùÒò×éÖÐȱʧ£¬ÕâÊÇ·ñÓëÊ÷üšÄܸÐȾ¶àÖÖÈËÀಡ¶¾µÄÏÖÏóÓйأ¿RIG-I»ùÒòȱʧºó£¬ÊÇ·ñ´æÔÚÌæ´ú·Ö×Ó£¬²¹³¥Æä¹¦ÄÜ£¬ÕâÊÇ·ñÊÇÊ÷üš¶ÔÓÚijЩÈËÀಡ¶¾¸ÐȾÂʵÍ¡¢¼«ÉÙÐγɳÖÐøÐÔ¸ÐȾµÄÔ­Òò£¿ÕâЩÎÊÌâµÄ½â´ð£¬¶ÔÓÚÈÏʶ²¸È鶯ÎïÌìÈ»ÃâÒß»ùÒòµÄ¹¦Äܽø»¯¡¢´´½¨Ê÷ü𲡶¾¸ÐȾģÐÍ£¬ÎÞÒɾßÓÐÖØÒªµÄÒâÒå¡£

À¥Ã÷¶¯ÎïËùÒ¦ÓÀ¸Õ¿ÎÌâ×éÕë¶ÔÊ÷üš»ùÒò×éÖÐRIG-I»ùÒòȱʧÕâÒ»ÏÖÏ󣬿ªÕ¹ÁËÉîÈëÑо¿¡£ËûÃÇ·¢ÏÖ£¬Ê÷üšËäȻȱʧRIG-I£¬µ«ÔÚ¶àÖÖ²¡¶¾´Ì¼¤ÏÂÈÔÄܹ»ÓÕµ¼Ê÷üšÏ¸°û²úÉúIÐ͸ÉÈÅËØ£¬Óɴ˱íÃ÷Ê÷üšÏ¸°ûÖдæÔÚRIG-I¹¦ÄÜÌæ´úÎï¡£RIG-IÑùÊÜÌå¼Ò×åµÄÁíÒ»³ÉÔ±MDA5£¬ÓëRIG-Iʶ±ð²»Í¬²¡¶¾ÖÖÀ༰²¡¶¾½á¹¹£¬Á½Õß¹¦Äܲ¢²»ÈßÓà¡£ËûÃÇÀûÓÃRIG-IÌØÒìÐÔʶ±ðµÄ²¡¶¾À´´Ì¼¤Ê÷üšÏ¸°û£¬²¢ÀûÓûùÒò¹ý±í´ïÓëÇóý¡¢Ó«¹âËØÃ¸±¨¸æÏµÍ³¡¢RNAÃâÒß¹²³ÁµíµÈ¶àÖÖʵÑéÊֶΣ¬Ö¤ÊµÁËMDA5Äܹ»²¿·ÖÌæ´úRIG-I¹¦ÄÜ£¬½ø¶øÊ¶±ðRIG-IÌØÒìÐÔʶ±ðµÄ²¡¶¾£¬½áºÏÓëRIG-IÏ໥×÷Óõĵ°°×MITA£¬ÓÕµ¼¸ÉÈÅËØ¦ÂµÄ²úÉú¡£½øÒ»²½´Ó½ø»¯µÄ½Ç¶È¶ÔMDA5ÉîÈë·ÖÎöºó·¢ÏÖ£¬Ê÷üšMDA5Êܵ½Ç¿ÁÒµÄÕýÑ¡Ôñ×÷Óã¬ÇÒ·¢ÉúÕýÑ¡ÔñµÄ°±»ùËáλµãλÓÚMDA5µ°°×µÄÖØÒª½á¹¹Óò¡£ÕâЩÊܵ½Ñ¡Ôñ×÷ÓõÄλµãÔÚ¶à¸ö¼¹×µ¶¯ÎïÖи߶ȱ£ÊØ¡£¶ÔÕâЩÕýÑ¡Ôñλµã¿ªÕ¹µÄÍ»±ä¹¦ÄÜ·ÖÎö֤ʵ£¬ÊÇÕâЩѡÔñλµã¸³ÓèÁËÊ÷üšMDA5¸ü¼ÓÇ¿´óµÄ¿¹²¡¶¾¹¦ÄÜ£¬ÔÚÂþ³¤µÄ½ø»¯¹ý³ÌÖÐÑÜÉú³öÁËÇ¿´óµÄÌæ´ú¹¦ÄÜ¡£ÓÐȤµÄÊÇ£¬ËûÃÇÔÚÈËÀàµÄMDA5µ°°×ÖÐÒýÈëÊ÷üšÖÐÊܵ½Ñ¡ÔñµÄ°±»ùËáλµã£¬·¢ÏÖÕâÖÖÈËÔìµÄÈËÀàMDA5Í»±äÌåÒ²»ñµÃ¸üÇ¿µÄ¿¹²¡¶¾ÄÜÁ¦¡£¸ÃÑо¿´ÓÊ÷üš»ùÒò×éRIG-I»ùÒòȱʧÕâÒ»ÏÖÏó³ö·¢£¬½áºÏϵͳµÄ¹¦ÄÜʵÑ飬ºÜºÃµØÕ¹ÏÖÁ˲¸È鶯β¡¶¾ÌìÈ»ÃâÒßµÄÊÊÓ¦ÐԺ͹¦ÄܶàÑùÐÔ¡£

ÉÏÊöÑо¿¹¤×÷ÒÔLoss of RIG-I leads to a functional replacement with MDA5 in the Chinese tree shrew ΪÌ⣬ÓÚ9ÔÂ12ÈÕ·¢±íÔÚ¡¶ÃÀ¹ú¿ÆÑ§ÔºÔº¿¯¡·£¨pNAS£©ÉÏ¡£Ò¦ÓÀ¸Õ¿ÎÌâ×éµÄ²©Ê¿ÐíÁèºÍÓ൤µ¤Îª¸ÃÂÛÎĵĹ²Í¬µÚÒ»×÷Õߣ¬Ò¦ÓÀ¸ÕΪͨѶ×÷Õß¡£¸ÃÑо¿¹¤×÷µÃµ½NSFC-ÔÆÄÏÁªºÏ»ù½ðÏîÄ¿£¨U1402224£©µÄ×ÊÖú¡£

ÈËÀàºÍÊ÷üšRLRÌìÈ»ÃâÒß¿¹²¡¶¾ÐźÅͨ·ģʽͼ

Ô­ÎÄÕªÒª£º

Loss of RIG-I leads to a functional replacement with MDA5 in the Chinese tree shrew

The function of the RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs; including RIG-I, MDA5, and LGp2) as key cytoplasmic sensors of viral pathogen-associated molecular patterns (pAMps) has been subjected to numerous pathogenic challenges and has undergone a dynamic evolution. We found evolutionary evidence that RIG-I was lost in the Chinese tree shrew lineage. Along with the loss of RIG-I, both MDA5 (tMDA5) and LGp2 (tLGp2) have undergone strong positive selection in the tree shrew. tMDA5 or tMDA5/tLGp2 could sense Sendai virus (an RNA virus posed as a RIG-I agonist) for inducing type I IFN, although conventional RIG-I and MDA5 were thought to recognize distinct RNA structures and viruses. tMDA5 interacted with adaptor tMITA (STINGTMEM173/ERIS), which was reported to bind only with RIG-I. The positively selected sites in tMDA5 endowed the substitute function for the lost RIG-I. These findings provided insights into the adaptation and functional diversity of innate antiviral activity in vertebrates.